Obligations to reduce one's green house gas emissions appear to be difficult to justify prior
to large-scale collective action because an individual's emissions have virtually no impact …

Many people living in highly industrialised countries and elsewhere emit greenhouse gases
at a certain high level as a by-product of their activities, and they expect to be able to …

Moral duties concerning climate change mitigation are–for good reasons–conventionally
construed as duties of institutional agents, usually states. Yet, in both scholarly debate and …

The overwhelming majority of the world's climate scientists hold that the Earth's climate is
changing and, moreover, that these changes are human-induced. The Intergovernmental …

Although actions of individuals do contribute to climate change, the question whether or not
they, too, are morally obligated to reduce the GHG emissions in their responsibility has not …

Environmental ethicists have not reached a consensus about whether or not individuals who
contribute to climate change have a moral obligation to reduce their personal greenhouse …

Many suggest that we should look backward and measure the differences among various
parties' past emissions of greenhouse gases to allocate moral responsibility to remedy …

Can unilateral action be an effective response to global climate change? Baylor Johnson
worries that a focus on unilateral action by individuals will detract from efforts to secure …

Many of us take it for granted that we ought to cooperate to tackle climate change. But where
does this requirement come from and what does it mean for us as individuals trying to do the …

In the climate ethics debate, scholars largely agree that individuals should promote
institutions that ensure the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This paper aims to …