Can recent failures to replicate psychological research be explained by typical magnitudes
of statistical power, bias or heterogeneity? A large survey of 12,065 estimated effect sizes …

A recent study of the replicability of key psychological findings is a major contribution toward
understanding the human side of the scientific process. Despite the careful and nuanced …

Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. However, because of strong incentives for
innovation and weak incentives for confirmation, direct replication is rarely practiced or …

INTRODUCTION Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it
characterizes current research is unknown. Scientific claims should not gain credence …

Replication is often viewed as the demarcation between science and nonscience. However,
contrary to the commonly held view, we show that in the current (selective) publication …

The current crisis in scientific psychology about whether our findings are irreproducible was
presaged years ago by Tversky and Kahneman (1971), who noted that even sophisticated …

Over the last few years, psychology researchers have become increasingly preoccupied
with the question of whether findings from psychological studies are generally replicable …

Replicability of findings is an essential prerequisite of research. For both basic and clinical
research, however, low replicability of findings has recently been reported. Replicability may …

Investigators from a large consortium of scientists recently performed a multi-year study in
which they replicated 100 psychology experiments. Although statistically significant results …

Failures to replicate published psychological research findings have contributed to a “crisis
of confidence.” Several reasons for these failures have been proposed, the most notable …