Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review

HGC Van Spall, A Toren, A Kiss, RA Fowler - Jama, 2007 - jamanetwork.com
ContextSelective eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are vital to trial
feasibility and internal validity. However, the exclusion of certain patient populations may …

Reproducible research practices are underused in systematic reviews of biomedical interventions

MJ Page, DG Altman, L Shamseer, JE McKenzie… - Journal of clinical …, 2018 - Elsevier
Objectives To evaluate how often reproducible research practices, which allow others to
recreate the findings of studies, given the original data, are used in systematic reviews (SRs) …

[HTML][HTML] Generalizability of findings from randomized controlled trials is limited in the leading general medical journals

A Malmivaara - Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019 - Elsevier
Objectives To document reporting of study characteristics of randomized controlled trials
(RCTs) in the four leading general medical journals and to appraise the generalizability of …

Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program

R Fu, G Gartlehner, M Grant, T Shamliyan… - Journal of clinical …, 2011 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: This article is to establish recommendations for conducting quantitative
synthesis, or meta-analysis, using study-level data in comparative effectiveness reviews …

Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials

J Nuovo, J Melnikow, D Chang - Jama, 2002 - jamanetwork.com
ContextOngoing efforts to improve the quality of reporting for randomized controlled trials
(RCTs) include the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. We …

The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start

L Thomas, ED Peterson - Jama, 2012 - jamanetwork.com
THE INCREASING AVAILABILITY OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH data combined with federal
investment has stimu-lated an expansion in observational clinical research. 1 Observational …

Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs

L Hartling, MP Hamm, A Milne, B Vandermeer… - Journal of clinical …, 2013 - Elsevier
Objectives To assess the reliability of the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool between
individual raters and across consensus agreements of pairs of reviewers and examine the …

[HTML][HTML] Integrating randomized comparative effectiveness research with patient care

LD Fiore, PW Lavori - New England Journal of Medicine, 2016 - Mass Medical Soc
Integrating Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Research with Patient Care | NEJM Skip to
main content NEJM Group Follow Us Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube LinkedIn Prepare …

Reporting of results in ClinicalTrials. gov and high-impact journals

JE Becker, HM Krumholz, G Ben-Josef, JS Ross - Jama, 2014 - jamanetwork.com
Methods| We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials for which the primary
results were published between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2011, in Medlineindexed, high …

[HTML][HTML] The number of patients and events required to limit the risk of overestimation of intervention effects in meta-analysis—a simulation study

K Thorlund, G Imberger, M Walsh, R Chu, C Gluud… - PloS one, 2011 - journals.plos.org
Background Meta-analyses including a limited number of patients and events are prone to
yield overestimated intervention effect estimates. While many assume bias is the cause of …