Recent experimental philosophy arguments have raised trouble for philosophers' reliance
on armchair intuitions. One popular line of response has been the expertise defense …

Experimental philosophers have empirically challenged the connection between intuition
and philosophical expertise. This paper reviews these challenges alongside other research …

Some proponents of “experimental philosophy” criticize philosophers' use of thought
experiments on the basis of evidence that the verdicts vary with truth‐independent factors …

Recent experimental studies indicate that epistemically irrelevant factors can skew our
intuitions, and that some degree of scepticism about appealing to intuition in philosophy is …

According to some critics, traditional armchair philosophical methodology relies in an illicit
way on intuitions. But the particular structure of the critique is not often carefully articulated …

Experimental restrictionists have challenged philosophers' reliance on intuitions about
thought experiment cases based on experimental findings. According to the expertise …

Experimental philosophers have challenged friends of the expertise defense to show that (a)
the intuitive judgments of professional philosophers are different from the intuitive judgments …

Many experimental philosophers are philosophers by training and professional affiliation,
but some best work in experimental philosophy has been done by people who do not have …

It has been standard philosophical practice in analytic philosophy to employ intuitions
generated in response to thought‐experiments as evidence in the evaluation of …

The perhaps most ambitious strand of current experimental philosophy—variously
characterized as 'the sources project'(Pust 2012) or the research programme of 'cognitive …