We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effects of radiofrequency ablation
(RFA) and surgical hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma …

Background There is no clear consensus on the better therapy [radiofrequency ablation
(RFA) versus hepatic resection (HR)] for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) eligible for …

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were used to identify all
randomized controlled trials comparing the survival between small HCC patients receiving …

Purpose To compare the benefits and harms of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and hepatic
resection (HR) and to test the consistency of currently available evidence. Materials and …

Abstract Background and Aim: To evaluate the evidence comparing radiofrequency ablation
(RFA) and surgical resection (RES) on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) …

Purpose The aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of
radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus surgical resection for patients with small …

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus
hepatic resection (HR) for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) meeting the Milan criteria …

Introduction: It remains unclear which surgery or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the more
effective treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare survival …

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of radiofrequency
ablation (RFA) with surgical resection (RES) in the treatment of small hepatocellular …

AIM: To evaluate survival and recurrence after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the
treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a meta-analysis. METHODS …