Background—The fractional flow reserve (FFR) value of 0.75 has been validated against
ischemic testing, whereas the FFR value of 0.80 has been widely accepted to guide clinical …

Background Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements in the so‐called gray‐zone range
of≥ 0.75 and⩽ 0.80 are associated with uncertainty concerning the guidance of patient …

Background: We evaluated the prognosis of deferred and revascularized coronary stenoses
after fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement to assess its revascularization threshold in …

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements can determine the haemodynamic relevance of
coronary artery stenoses. Current guidelines recommend their use in lesions in the absence …

Aims Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has proven to its prognostic and therapeutic value.
However, the additive prognostic value of coronary flow reserve (CFR) remains unclear. This …

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has become an established tool for guiding
treatment, but its graded relationship to clinical outcomes as modulated by medical therapy …

Revascularization of ischemia‐producing coronary lesions is widely used in the
management of coronary artery disease. However, some coronary lesions appear significant …

Aims There are limited data on the clinical implications of total physiologic atherosclerotic
burden assessed by invasive physiologic studies in patients with coronary artery disease …

Background The safety of deferring revascularization based on fractional flow reserve (FFR)
during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is unclear. We evaluated the association of FFR and …

Objectives The aim of this study was to demonstrate the clinical implications of combined
assessment of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR). Background …