Replication is often viewed as the demarcation between science and nonscience. However,
contrary to the commonly held view, we show that in the current (selective) publication …

A recent study of the replicability of key psychological findings is a major contribution toward
understanding the human side of the scientific process. Despite the careful and nuanced …

The view that a single study can be trusted is an attractive but false promise provided by null
hypothesis testing. The replication question should be to what extent investigators can …

Large-scale replication studies like the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP: P) provide
invaluable systematic data on scientific replicability, but most analyses and interpretations of …

Replication of empirical findings plays a fundamental role in science. Among experimental
psychologists, successful replication enhances belief in a finding, while a failure to replicate …

Psychological scientists are now trying to replicate published research from scratch to
confirm the findings. In an increasingly widespread replication study design, each of several …

Psychology advances knowledge by testing statistical hypotheses using empirical
observations and data. The expectation is that most statistically significant findings can be …

Can recent failures to replicate psychological research be explained by typical magnitudes
of statistical power, bias or heterogeneity? A large survey of 12,065 estimated effect sizes …

Failures to replicate published psychological research findings have contributed to a “crisis
of confidence.” Several reasons for these failures have been proposed, the most notable …

Psychology is undergoing a replication crisis. The discussion surrounding this crisis has
centered on mistrust of previous findings. Researchers planning replication studies often …