The US Supreme Court decisions in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
Kumho Tire Co. Ltd. v. Carmichael transformed the way scientific expert evidence was …

Many studies regarding the legal status of forensic science have relied on the US Supreme
Court's mandate in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., and its progeny in order to …

In June of 1993, the US Supreme Court, in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
rejected the Frye “general acceptance” rule under which evidence proffered as scientific had …

This article reviews the fundamental assumptions of forensic identification
(“individualization”) science and notes the lack of empirical evidence or theory supporting its …

Abstract The 1993 US Supreme Court decision Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. presented new guidance for the judicial assessment of expert witness evidence and …

Supreme Court's watershed decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in
1993, 1 one of the most persistent issues has been a perceived lack of rigor in the …

In recent years there have been several discussions amongst forensic science policy
makers, forensic practitioners, legal practitioners, and academia regarding the most …

While the US jurisprudence of the 1993 Daubert hearing requires judges to question not
only the methodology behind, but also the principles governing, a body of knowledge to …

In 1993, the Supreme Court of the United States stated that with the federal adoption of
statutory rules of evidence in 1975, the common law rule for determining admissibility of …

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Report on forensic science provides a searing
critique of the field. 2 Released in 2009, the Report's findings are disturbing:" Among …