Reporting time horizons in randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery: a systematic review

S Mowakket, M Karpinski, L Gallo, M Gallo… - Plastic and …, 2018 - journals.lww.com
Background: Current guidelines for randomized controlled trial reporting do not require
authors to justify their choice of time horizon. This is concerning, as the time horizon when …

How “low-level” evidence has changed plastic surgery: Time to appreciate the value of case reports and case series

A Momeni, DC Wan - Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2015 - journals.lww.com
The advent of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has undoubtedly changed the face of clinical
medicine. It has not only altered the way clinical research is approached but it has also …

Reporting of planned statistical methods in published surgical randomised trial protocols: a protocol for a methodological systematic review

K Madden, E Arseneau, N Evaniew, CS Smith… - BMJ open, 2016 - bmjopen.bmj.com
Introduction Poor reporting can lead to inadequate presentation of data, confusion regarding
research methodology used, selective reporting of results, and other misinformation …

Systematic reviews: A primer for plastic surgery research

Z Margaliot, KC Chung - Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2007 - journals.lww.com
Clinicians rely on review articles to keep current with the rapid accumulation of medical and
surgical literature. Traditional expert reviews, however, often suffer from inherent personal …

Revisiting Level of Evidence Ratings in Plastic Surgery: A Call to Action

J Covone, H ElHawary, S Abdulkarim… - Aesthetic Surgery …, 2024 - academic.oup.com
Background Evidence-based medicine underpins medical and surgical practice, with level
of evidence (LOE) being a key aspect that allows clinicians and researchers to better …

Addressing the strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement in archives of plastic surgery reports

JH Lee - Archives of plastic surgery, 2014 - thieme-connect.com
Revised: 30 Dec 2013• Accepted: 30 Dec 2013 pISSN: 2234-6163• eISSN: 2234-6171
http://dx. doi. org/10.5999/aps. 2014.41. 1.1• Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41: 1-2 observational …

A commentary on:“STROCSS 2019 guideline: Strengthening the reporting of cohort studies in surgery”[Int. J. Surg. 72 (2019) 156–165]

B Peiris, K Koshy - International Journal of Surgery, 2020 - journals.lww.com
We took interest in the update of the STROCSS 2019 guideline [1] and its role in improving
the quality of research reporting in observational studies including cohort, case-control and …

A systematic review of surgical randomized controlled trials: Part I. Risk of bias and outcomes: Common pitfalls plastic surgeons can overcome

SH Voineskos, CJ Coroneos… - Plastic and …, 2016 - journals.lww.com
Background: The authors investigated the methodological validity of plastic surgery
randomized controlled trials that compared surgical interventions. Methods: An electronic …

A systematic review of power and sample size reporting in randomized controlled trials within plastic surgery

O Ayeni, L Dickson, TA Ignacy… - Plastic and reconstructive …, 2012 - journals.lww.com
Background: The randomized controlled trial is a reliable study design for assessing the
effectiveness of a surgical intervention, provided it is adequately powered. This systematic …

Quality of publications in plastic surgery

O Mornet, JL Grolleau, I Garrido, F Bekara… - Annales de Chirurgie …, 2015 - europepmc.org
Methods The 8 top-ranked plastic surgery journals were selected. We manually reviewed
the last 40 original articles in each plastic surgery journal, to represent more than 2 months …