Motivation: Protein–protein complexes are known to play key roles in many cellular
processes. However, they are often not accessible to experimental study because of their …

Motivation: The limited success rate of protein–protein docking procedures is generally
attributed to structure differences between the bound and unbound states of the molecules …

With the development of many computational methods that predict the structural models of
protein‐protein complexes, there is a pressing need to benchmark their performance. As …

Most scoring functions for protein–protein docking algorithms are either atom‐based or
residue‐based, with the former being able to produce higher quality structures and latter …

Protein–protein docking has made much progress in recent years, but challenges still exist.
Here we present the application of our docking approach HoDock in CAPRI. In this …

Background Protein-protein docking, which aims to predict the structure of a protein-protein
complex from its unbound components, remains an unresolved challenge in structural …

Computational prediction of protein complex structures through docking offers a means to
gain a mechanistic understanding of protein interactions that mediate biological processes …

Protein‐protein interactions are abundant in the cell but to date structural data for a large
number of complexes is lacking. Computational docking methods can complement …

We present a new version of the Protein–Protein Docking Benchmark, reconstructed from
the bottom up to include more complexes, particularly focusing on more unbound–unbound …

Correctly scoring protein-protein docking models to single out native-like ones is an open
challenge. It is also an object of assessment in CAPRI (Critical Assessment of PRedicted …