Little work has focused on resilience amongst older adults, and few factors have been
identified that promote their resilience. Kalisch et al. suggest that socioenvironmental factors …

Adding to the resilience model of Kalisch and colleagues, we suggest that resilience is
associated with accurate rather than excessively positive or negative appraisal or …

A social ecological model of resilience avoids the reductionism of simple explanations of the
complex and multisystemic processes associated with well-being in contexts of adversity …

We argue that social psychology has unique potential for advancing understanding of
resilience. An exciting development that illustrates this is the emergence of social …

We are delighted by the broad, intense, and fruitful discussion in reaction to our target
article. A major point we take from the many comments is a prevailing feeling in the research …

Kalisch and colleagues identify several routes to a better understanding of mechanisms
underlying resilience and highlight the need to integrate findings from neuroscience and …

In contrast to the PASTOR model by Kalisch et al. we point to the potential negative long-
term effects of positive (re) appraisals of events for resilience. This perspective posits that …

The authors provide an original and integrative framework for understanding the complex
array of factors that contribute to resilience. Their faith in the uniform benefits of positive …

Although the PASTOR model provides a comprehensive framework to study resilience, it
faces some challenges. First, some higher-order concepts (eg, meaning) may be difficult to …

According to Kalisch et al., adopting a cognitive positive appraisal style promotes internal
bodily homeostasis and acts as a safeguard against the detrimental effects of stress. Here …