Background Evidence‐based recommendations for a core outcome set (COS; minimum set
of outcomes) for aphasia treatment research have been developed (the Research Outcome …

Background A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to
address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to …

Background: Aphasia treatment research lacks a uniform approach to outcome
measurement. A wide range of outcome instruments are used across trials and there is a …

Background: Clinicians have expressed frustration at the lack of strong evidence for aphasia
treatments. Inconsistent outcome measurement practices across treatment trials have …

Purpose The purpose of this article is to identify outcome constructs that aphasia
researchers consider essential to measure in all aphasia treatment research. Method …

Purpose A core outcome set (COS; an agreed minimum set of outcomes) was developed to
address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in poststroke aphasia treatment …

Purpose: This study synthesised the findings of three separate consensus processes
exploring the perspectives of key stakeholder groups about important aphasia treatment …

The development of a core set standards for evaluating the outcomes of treatments for
aphasia is an important and inevitable step forward. To maximise the success of this effort …

Purpose: Conversation-focused speech-language pathology services are a top priority for
people living with aphasia, but little is known about how researchers measure conversation …

Background Treatment success is the desired outcome in aphasia rehabilitation. However,
to date, there is a lack of consensus on what defines a'successful'result on a given aphasia …