Recent controversies in psychology have spurred conversations about the nature and
quality of psychological research. One topic receiving substantial attention is the role of …

Recent research in psychology has highlighted a number of replication problems in the
discipline, with publication bias–the preference for publishing original and positive results …

A recent study of the replicability of key psychological findings is a major contribution toward
understanding the human side of the scientific process. Despite the careful and nuanced …

Conjecture about the weak replicability in social sciences has made scholars eager to
quantify the scale and scope of replication failure for a discipline. Yet small-scale manual …

In principle, successful replications should enhance the credibility of scientific findings, and
failed replications should reduce credibility. Yet it is unknown how replication typically …

Reproducibility is a defining feature of science. However, because of strong incentives for
innovation and weak incentives for confirmation, direct replication is rarely practiced or …

Psychology advances knowledge by testing statistical hypotheses using empirical
observations and data. The expectation is that most statistically significant findings can be …

Replication is often viewed as the demarcation between science and nonscience. However,
contrary to the commonly held view, we show that in the current (selective) publication …

Can recent failures to replicate psychological research be explained by typical magnitudes
of statistical power, bias or heterogeneity? A large survey of 12,065 estimated effect sizes …

Replication initiatives in psychology continue to gather considerable attention from far
outside the field, as well as controversy from within. Some accomplishments of these …