The possibility that low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) promote lower quality diets and, therefore,
weight gain has been noted as a cause for concern. Data from a representative sample of …

Results: Approximately 30% of US adults consumed some type of LCS, with 19.5%
consuming LCS beverages, 11.4% consuming tabletop LCS and 4.6% consuming LCS …

The application of low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) in foods and beverages has increased over
the past 35 y. At the same time, many characteristics of the American diet have changed …

Background Consumption of low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) has increased markedly during
the past several decades, yet the prevalence of LCS consumption in recent years is currently …

Abstract Background Low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs), artificial sweeteners, or high-intensity
sweeteners are incorporated into foods, beverages, and food and beverage additions …

Background: Low-calorie and no-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) have emerged as alternatives
to added sugars. Research suggests that consumption among all Americans is increasing …

Background: Low-calorie sweeteners (LCSs) are said to be a risk factor for obesity and
diabetes. Reverse causality may be an alternative explanation. Methods: Data on LCS use …

Low-calorie sweeteners (LCS) offer a palatable alternative to caloric sugars such as sucrose
(table sugar) and high fructose corn syrup and are commonly found in soft drinks, sweetener …

Background: Replacement of caloric sweeteners with lower-or no-calorie alternatives may
facilitate weight loss or weight maintenance by helping to reduce energy intake; however …

Background and aims White sugar has been blamed to cause health consequences
including diabetes and obesity. With the increased need to decrease sugar intake, attention …