Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?
Objective.—To evaluate the results of large clinical trials vs the pooled results of smaller
trials. Data Identification.—Mata-analyses with at least 1" large" study were identified from …
trials. Data Identification.—Mata-analyses with at least 1" large" study were identified from …
Meta-analysis: methods, strengths, weaknesses, and political uses
JH Noble Jr - Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, 2006 - Elsevier
The general methodology, strengths and weaknesses, and political uses of meta-analysis
are examined. As a systematic study of all studies that have been conducted to answer a …
are examined. As a systematic study of all studies that have been conducted to answer a …
Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.
ME Charlson, RI Horwitz - Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1984 - bmj.com
The problem of generalisability in randomised clinical trials was highlighted by studies that
entered only 10-14% of screened patients. To determine the magnitude and source of …
entered only 10-14% of screened patients. To determine the magnitude and source of …
Single-center trials tend to provide larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: a systematic review
S Unverzagt, R Prondzinsky, F Peinemann - Journal of clinical …, 2013 - Elsevier
Objectives To assess whether the reported trial characteristics are associated with treatment
effects on all-cause mortality within critical care medicine. Study Design and Setting We …
effects on all-cause mortality within critical care medicine. Study Design and Setting We …
Including non‐randomized studies
This chapter has been prepared by the Non-Randomised Studies Methods Group (NRSMG)
of The Cochrane Collaboration (see Box 13.8. a). It is intended to support review authors …
of The Cochrane Collaboration (see Box 13.8. a). It is intended to support review authors …
Why all randomised controlled trials produce biased results
A Krauss - Annals of medicine, 2018 - Taylor & Francis
Abstract Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are commonly viewed as the
best research method to inform public health and social policy. Usually they are thought of …
best research method to inform public health and social policy. Usually they are thought of …
Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols
R Mhaskar, B Djulbegovic, A Magazin… - Journal of clinical …, 2012 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the reported methodological quality of randomized
controlled trials (RCTs) reflects the actual methodological quality and to evaluate the …
controlled trials (RCTs) reflects the actual methodological quality and to evaluate the …
Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: the ACTG 320 trial
Properly planned and conducted randomized clinical trials remain susceptible to a lack of
external validity. The authors illustrate a model-based method to standardize observed trial …
external validity. The authors illustrate a model-based method to standardize observed trial …
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
ContextPrevious studies indicate that industry-sponsored trials tend to draw proindustry
conclusions. ObjectiveTo explore whether the association between funding and conclusions …
conclusions. ObjectiveTo explore whether the association between funding and conclusions …
The role of randomization in clinical studies: myths and beliefs.
U Abel, A Koch - Journal of clinical epidemiology, 1999 - europepmc.org
On the basis of a survey of the methodological literature, we analyze widespread views on
randomization and the advantage of randomized over nonrandomized studies. These views …
randomization and the advantage of randomized over nonrandomized studies. These views …