Propensity score analysis of a six-year experience with minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement.

R Sharony, EA Grossi, PC Saunders… - The Journal of heart …, 2004 - europepmc.org
Methods Between January 1995 and December 2002, a total of 921 consecutive patients
underwent isolated AVR; 438 of these patients had MIAVR. Two matched cohorts each of …

Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a 10-year experience

A Korach, RJ Shemin, CT Hunter… - Journal of …, 2010 - search.proquest.com
AIM: Data on the impact of minimally invasive approach on clinical outcomes after isolated
aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) are limited and somewhat controversial. The aim of the …

Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched study from the UK national data

RQ Attia, GL Hickey, SW Grant, B Bridgewater… - …, 2016 - journals.sagepub.com
Objective Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) has been demonstrated as a
safe and effective option but remains underused. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of isolated …

Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity‐matched data

JY Lim, SV Deo, SE Altarabsheh… - Journal of cardiac …, 2015 - Wiley Online Library
Background Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mAVR) is increasingly preferred
over conventional AVR (cAVR). However, data comparing these procedures present …

[HTML][HTML] Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience

D Gilmanov, M Solinas, PA Farneti… - Annals of …, 2015 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background This study reports the single center experience on minimally invasive aortic
valve replacement (MIAVR), performed through a right anterior minithoracotomy or …

Midterm results and quality of life after minimally invasive vs. conventional aortic valve replacement

C Detter, T Deuse, DH Boehm… - The Thoracic and …, 2002 - thieme-connect.com
Background: This study compares early and mid-term results as well as the quality of life
(QOL) between the minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) …

Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.

M Hassan, Y Miao, A Maraey, J Lincoln… - The Journal of heart …, 2015 - europepmc.org
Methods Eight reports from the United States were selected from amongst 33,494 literature
citations based on sample size and data completeness. Perioperative variables were …

[HTML][HTML] Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: a real-world …

RK Ghanta, DJ Lapar, JA Kern, IL Kron… - The Journal of thoracic …, 2015 - Elsevier
Background Several single-center studies have reported excellent outcomes with minimally
invasive aortic valve replacement (mini-AVR). Although criticized as requiring more …

Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with improved survival: a propensity-matched comparison

DR Merk, S Lehmann, DM Holzhey… - European Journal of …, 2015 - academic.oup.com
OBJECTIVES To compare early and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
versus full sternotomy (FS) isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). METHODS We …

Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve replacement: The network meta‐analysis

T Ogami, Y Yokoyama, H Takagi… - Journal of Cardiac …, 2022 - Wiley Online Library
Background Outcome comparisons after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with
minimally invasive approaches including mini‐sternotomy (MS) and right mini‐thoracotomy …