Objectives To determine the presence of a set of pre-specified traditional and progressive
criteria used to assess scientists for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences …

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the presence of a set of
prespecified criteria used to assess scientists for promotion and tenure within faculties of …

Objective To determine the presence of a set of pre-specified traditional and non-traditional
criteria used to assess scientists for promotion and tenure in faculties of biomedical sciences …

There is always a lot of confusion among staff working in health science colleges regarding
the indexing of journals on criteria for points for promtion. This review navigates the dynamic …

Assessment of researchers is necessary for decisions of hiring, promotion, and tenure. A
burgeoning number of scientific leaders believe the current system of faculty incentives and …

The way in which we assess researchers has been under the radar in the past few years.
Critics argue that current research assessments focus on productivity and that they increase …

It is unknown to what extent leading researchers are currently involved in the leadership of
leading research universities as presidents or as executive board members. The academic …

Both citation and funding metrics converge in shaping current perceptions of academic
success. We aimed to evaluate what proportion of the most-cited USA-based biomedical …

Measuring and predicting the success of junior faculty is of considerable interest to faculty,
academic institutions, funding agencies and faculty development and mentoring programs …

The review, promotion, and tenure (RPT) process is central to academic life and workplace
advancement. It influences where faculty direct their attention, research, and publications. By …