In their controversial paper 'After-birth abortion', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
argue that there is no rational basis for allowing abortion but prohibiting infanticide ('after …

In a recent paper, Giubilini and Minerva argue for the moral permissibility of what they call
'after-birth abortion', or infanticide. Here I suggest that they actually employ a confusion of …

The argument for the moral permissibility of killing newborns is a challenge to liberal
positions on abortion because it can be considered a reductio of their defence of abortion …

In'After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?', Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva
challenge the widely-held belief that the moral status of newborn infants differs from that of …

In their paper'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'Alberto Giubilini and Francesca
Minerva argue that because there are no significant differences between a fetus and a …

This is a response to Giubilini and Minerva arguing that, on the basis of the similar moral
status of the fetus and infant, infanticide is justifiable for many of the same reasons that justify …

Giubilini and Minerva argue that the permissibility of abortion entails the permissibility of
infanticide. Proponents of what we refer to as the Birth Strategy claim that there is a morally …

Giubilini and Minerva present a clear argument for the view that, other things being equal,
reasons that justify abortion also hold for early infanticide. 1 A reasoned argument deserves …

In 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?', Giubilini and Minerva argue that
infanticide should be permitted for the same reasons as abortion. In particular, they argue …

In the article 'After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'arguments are made in favour of
the moral permissibility of intentionally killing newborn infants, under particular conditions …