Discontent and confusion: primary care providers' opinions and understanding of current cervical cancer screening recommendations

E Boone, LV Lewis, M Karp - Journal of women's health, 2016 - liebertpub.com
Background: In 2012, new cervical cancer screening guidelines were published by three
widely recognized entities which advocate delayed onset of testing, fewer screenings …

Adherence to the 2012 national cervical cancer screening guidelines: a pilot study

DGK Teoh, AE Marriott, RI Vogel, RT Marriott… - American journal of …, 2015 - Elsevier
Objective The goal of this pilot study was to evaluate adherence to the 2012 cervical cancer
screening guidelines among health care providers in a large health maintenance …

Differences among primary care physicians' adherence to 2009 ACOG guidelines for cervical cancer screening

J Corbelli, S Borrero, R Bonnema… - Journal of Women's …, 2014 - liebertpub.com
Abstract Background: In 2009, the American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(ACOG) guidelines for cervical cancer screening changed significantly, to recommend less …

Patient knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening after the 2012 screening guidelines

JM Clay, JK Daggy, S Fluellen, BT Edmonds - Patient education and …, 2019 - Elsevier
Objective To assess women's attitudes and preferences related to recent changes in cervical
cancer screening guidelines. Methods We distributed 380 surveys in three University based …

Women's perceptions and preferences for cervical cancer screening in light of updated guidelines

G Bustamante, E Liebermann, K McNair… - Journal of the …, 2023 - journals.lww.com
Background: Updated risk-based guidelines for cervical cancer screening (CCS) allow for
individualized screening that minimizes unnecessary testing. However, these guidelines are …

[HTML][HTML] Patient, provider, and clinic factors associated with the use of cervical cancer screening

JS Haas, C Vogeli, L Yu, SJ Atlas, CS Skinner… - Preventive Medicine …, 2021 - Elsevier
Cervical cancer screening delivery remains suboptimal. Understanding the multiple
influences on use of screening is important to designing interventions. We describe the …

Current practice patterns in cervical cancer screening in Indiana

NR King, KM Kasper, JK Daggy, BT Edmonds - American Journal of …, 2014 - Elsevier
Objective The purpose of this study is to describe current health care provider cervical
cancer screening practice patterns for average-risk women in the state of Indiana in …

Attitudes toward the American Cancer Society's 2020 cervical cancer screening guidelines: A qualitative study of a national sample of US clinicians

AD Michel, HB Fontenot, L Fuzzell, NC Brownstein… - Cancer, 2024 - Wiley Online Library
Abstract Background The 2020 American Cancer Society (ACS) guidelines are the most
recent national guidelines for cervical cancer screening. These guidelines propose two …

Gaps between recommendations and their implementation: a register-based study of follow-up after abnormalities in cervical cancer screening

SF Jørgensen, B Andersen, M Rebolj, SH Njor - Preventive Medicine, 2021 - Elsevier
Follow-up after screen-detected abnormalities is crucial for the success of cervical cancer
screening programs but is usually not closely monitored in official screening statistics. We …

Identifying a “range of reasonable options” for cervical cancer screening

GF Sawaya, M Kuppermann - Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015 - journals.lww.com
This issue of Obstetrics & Gynecology includes three articles related to cervical cancer
screening intervals: a commentary (see page 311), a survey (see page 317), and interim …