Decisions in surgical oncology are increasingly being made by multi-disciplinary teams
(MDTs). Although MDTs have been widely accepted as the preferred model for cancer …

BACKGROUND: It is becoming a standard practice worldwide for cancer patients to be
discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT or 'tumour board') in order to formulate an expert …

Purpose Teamworking and clinical decision-making are important in multidisciplinary cancer
teams (MDTs). Our objective is to assess the quality of information presentation and MDT …

Background Factors that affect the quality of clinical decisions of multidisciplinary cancer
teams (MDTs) are not well understood. We reviewed and synthesised the evidence on …

AIM: To describe systems for capturing and optimising collective knowledge and insight in
areas of complexity and uncertainty in surgical oncology, with particular reference to the …

Background Anecdotally, organizational factors appear to have an effect on the quality of
decision-making in the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting. We assess the effect of the …

Abstract Background Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are the standard means of making
clinical decisions in surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to explore the views of MDT …

Management decisions for patients with cancer are frequently taken within the context of a
multi-disciplinary team (MDT). There is little known, however, about decision-making at team …

Abstract Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS), an important part of clinical practice,
are comprised of a: knowledge base; program for integrating patient‐specific information …

Background In many healthcare systems, treatment recommendations for cancer patients
are formulated by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs). Evidence suggests that …