Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial

S Celarier, S Monziols, B Célérier… - British Journal of …, 2021 - academic.oup.com
Trial design This is a phase III, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Methods In this
trial, patients with laparoscopic colectomy were assigned to either low pressure (LP: 7 …

[HTML][HTML] Comparative study of low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a randomised controlled trial

DB Kanwer, L Kaman, M Nedounsejiane… - Tropical …, 2010 - tropicalgastro.com
Introduction: Standard pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
employs a pressure range of 12-14 mm Hg. An emerging trend has been the use of low …

[HTML][HTML] An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a …

O Diaz-Cambronero, G Mazzinari, CL Errando… - Trials, 2019 - Springer
Background A recent study shows that a multifaceted strategy using an individualised intra-
abdominal pressure titration strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery results in an …

[HTML][HTML] Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized …

M Ortenzi, G Montori, A Sartori, A Balla, E Botteri… - Surgical …, 2022 - Springer
Introduction It has been previously demonstrated that the rise of intra-abdominal pressures
and prolonged exposure to such pressures can produce changes in the cardiovascular and …

[HTML][HTML] What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review

DMD Özdemir-van Brunschot, KC van Laarhoven… - Surgical …, 2016 - Springer
Background Laparoscopic surgery has several advantages when compared to open
surgery, including faster postoperative recovery and lower pain scores. However, for …

Effect of an individualized versus standard pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy on postoperative recovery: a randomized clinical trial in laparoscopic colorectal …

O Díaz-Cambronero, G Mazzinari… - Journal of British …, 2020 - academic.oup.com
Background It remains uncertain whether individualization of pneumoperitoneum pressures
during laparoscopic surgery improves postoperative recovery. This study compared an …

Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

J Hua, J Gong, L Yao, B Zhou, Z Song - The American Journal of Surgery, 2014 - Elsevier
Background The feasibility and safety of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic
cholecystectomy remain unclear. Methods A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials …

Comparison of standard-pressure and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double blinded randomized controlled study

N Vijayaraghavan, SC Sistla, P Kundra… - Surgical Laparoscopy …, 2014 - journals.lww.com
Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing LC (n= 43) were randomized into the LPLC (8
mm Hg) group (n= 22) and the SPLC (12 mm Hg) group (n= 21). Postoperative pain …

[HTML][HTML] A multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter observational feasibility study

O Diaz-Cambronero, B Flor Lorente, G Mazzinari… - Surgical …, 2019 - Springer
Background While guidelines for laparoscopic abdominal surgery advise using the lowest
possible intra-abdominal pressure, commonly a standard pressure is used. We evaluated …

Lower intra-abdominal pressure has no cardiopulmonary benefits during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial

YJ Cho, H Paik, SY Jeong, JW Park, WY Jo, Y Jeon… - Surgical …, 2018 - Springer
Background Higher intra-abdominal pressure may impair cardiopulmonary functions during
laparoscopic surgery. While 12–15 mmHg is generally recommended as a standard …