This study measured proactive and reactive response inhibition and their relationships with
self-reported impulsivity. We examined the domains of both vocal and manual responding …

The stop-signal paradigm has become ubiquitous in investigations of inhibitory control.
Tasks inspired by the paradigm, referred to as stop-signal tasks, require participants to make …

Decades of theory and experimental evidence underscore the critical importance of
inhibitory functions to flexible, contextappropriate and goal-directed action (Diamond et al …

Response inhibition is frequently measured by the Go/no-go and Stop-signal tasks. These
two are often used indiscriminately under the assumption that both measure similar …

Inhibitory control is the ability to suppress inappropriate movements and unwanted actions,
allowing to regulate impulses and responses. This ability can be measured via the Stop …

Inhibiting movements has been investigated widely using the countermanding (stop signal)
paradigm. Although it has been assumed that response inhibition, as measured by the …

The ability to stop simple ongoing actions has been extensively studied using the stop signal
task, but less is known about inhibition in more complex scenarios. Here we used a task …

Many studies have examined the rapid stopping of action as a proxy of human self-control.
Several methods have shown that a critical focus for stopping is the right inferior frontal …

The aim of this selective review paper is to clarify potential confusion when referring to the
term proactive inhibitory control. Illustrated by a concise overview of the literature, we …

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of frequency of occurrence of stop signals in
the stop-signal paradigm. Presenting stop signals less frequently resulted in faster reaction …