Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind …

M Ashina, S Tepper, JL Brandes, U Reuter… - …, 2018 - journals.sagepub.com
Erenumab was … and safety of monthly erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) versus placebo in the
subgroup of patients who had previously failed preventive treatment(s) (≥ 1, ≥ 2 prior failed

Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind …

PJ Goadsby, K Paemeleire, G Broessner… - …, 2019 - journals.sagepub.com
… who have previously failed treatment with other preventive … safety, and tolerability of
erenumab in the subgroup of patients in STRIVE who had failed migraine preventive treatment

Two-year efficacy and safety of erenumab in participants with episodic migraine and 2–4 prior preventive treatment failures: results from the LIBERTY study

MD Ferrari, U Reuter, PJ Goadsby… - Journal of Neurology …, 2022 - jnnp.bmj.com
… -term effects of monthly erenumab 140 mg in individuals with EM in whom 2–4 migraine
preventives had failed, ~70% of≥50% responders in the erenumab treatment arm at the onset …

Long‐term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine in whom prior preventive treatments had failed: A subgroup analysis

M Ashina, SJ Tepper, JL Brandes… - … : The Journal of …, 2022 - Wiley Online Library
… preventive treatment(s)? This study provides evidence that efficacy was sustained with
erenumab treatment in patients with CM in whom prior preventive treatments had failed, and that …

[HTML][HTML] The appropriate dosing of erenumab for migraine prevention after multiple preventive treatment failures: a critical appraisal

R Ornello, C Tiseo, I Frattale, G Perrotta… - The Journal of …, 2019 - Springer
… the safety and efficacy of erenumab in patients with prior preventive treatment failures. We
… The 140 mg monthly dose of erenumab had a numerical advantage over the 70 mg monthly …

[HTML][HTML] … and safety of erenumab in Japanese migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure or concomitant preventive treatment: subgroup analyses of a …

K Hirata, F Sakai, T Takeshima, N Imai… - The Journal of …, 2021 - Springer
… assessed the efficacy and safety of erenumab 70 mg for the … safety of erenumab 70 mg
treatment in the subgroups of Japanese patients with/without prior preventive treatment failure

Efficacy and tolerability of erenumab in patients with episodic migraine in whom two-to-four previous preventive treatments were unsuccessful: a randomised, double …

U Reuter, PJ Goadsby, M Lanteri-Minet, S Wen… - The Lancet, 2018 - thelancet.com
… The tolerability and safety profiles of erenumab and placebo were similar. The most … of
subgroups of patients with previous treatment failure in earlier migraine trials with erenumab. …

Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Participants With Episodic Migraine in Whom 2–4 Prior Preventive Treatments Had Failed: LIBERTY 3-Year Study

U Reuter, PJ Goadsby, MD Ferrari, GP Da Silva Lima… - Neurology, 2024 - AAN Enterprises
… or erenumab in the DBTP after receiving erenumab in the OLEP. Considering a recent
update to the erenumab … (FDA) to change the safety label to indicate possible erenumab-induced …

Long-term efficacy and safety of erenumab: results from 64 weeks of the LIBERTY study

PJ Goadsby, U Reuter, M Lanteri-Minet… - Neurology, 2021 - AAN Enterprises
… or deemed not suitable for another preventive treatment such as propranolol or metoprolol…
failed or deemed not suitable for valproate or divalproex. Treatment failure (efficacy and safety

[PDF][PDF] Three-Year Efficacy and Safety of Erenumab in Participants with Episodic Migraine and 2–4 Prior Preventive Treatment Failures: Results from the LIBERTY …

U Reuter, PJ Goadsby, MD Ferrari… - JOURNAL OF …, 2021 - medcommshydhosting.com
… , we present the efficacy and safety of erenumab 140 mg at the completion of … erenumab
in patients with difficult-to-treat EM in whom 2–4 prior migraine preventive treatments had failed