This Article argues that modern courts read individual federal statutes to encompass more
issues than identically worded state statutes would be understood to cover. There are many …

This Article argues that modern courts read individual federal statutes to encompass more
issues than identically worded state statutes would be understood to cover. There are many …

This Article argues that modern courts read individual federal statutes to encompass more
issues than identically worded state statutes would be understood to cover. There are many …

In the late 1960s, both the California state legislature and the federal Congress enacted
statutes that protect the privacy of telephone conversations by restricting the use of wiretaps …

In the late 1960s, both the California state legislature and the federal Congress enacted
statutes that protect the privacy of telephone conversations by restricting the use of wiretaps …

This Article calls attention to a difference between the implementation of state statutes and
the implementation of federal statutes. When a state legislature enacts a statute, the state's …

This Article argues that modern courts read individual federal statutes to en-compass more
issues than identically worded state statutes would be understood to cover. There are many …

1 See 1967 Cal Stat 3584, 3584–88, codified at Cal Penal Code § 630 et seq; Omnibus
Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 § 802, Pub L No 90-351, 82 Stat 197, 212–23 …

This Article argues that modern courts read individual federal statutes to en-compass more
issues than identically worded state statutes would be understood to cover. There are many …

In the late 1960s, both the California state legislature and the federal Congress enacted
statutes that protect the privacy of telephone conversations by restricting the use of wiretaps …