With Perry Hendricks, I recently outlined a strengthened version of the impairment argument
(SIA) for the immorality of abortion. Alex Gillham has argued that our use of Don Marquis' …

Blackshaw and Hendricks recently developed a strengthened version of the impairment
argument (SIA) that imports Marquis' account of the wrongness of abortion. I then argued …

Perry Hendricks' original 'impairment argument'against abortion relied on 'the impairment
principle'(TIP):'if it is immoral to impair an organism O to the nth degree, then, ceteris …

In 'Why Abortion is Immoral', Don Marquis argues that abortion is wrong for the same reason
that murder is wrong, namely, that it deprives a human being of an FLO, a 'future like …

Perry Hendricks' original impairment argument for the immorality of abortion is based on the
impairment principle: if impairing an organism to some degree is immoral, then ceteris …

In my essay, a critique of “the best secular argument against abortion” I reconstructed and
criticised two versions of Don Marquis's well-known argument against abortion. In critiquing …

In 'Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis', Anna Christensen contends that Don
Marquis' influential 'future like ours' argument for the immorality of abortion faces a …

In an earlier essay in this journal I critiqued Don Marquis's well-known argument against
abortion. I distinguished two versions of Marquis's argument, which I refer to as 'the essence …

In my article" Even if the fetus is not a person, abortion is immoral: The impairment
argument"(this journal), I defended what I called “The impairment argument” which purports …

Perry Hendricks has recently presented the impairment argument for the immorality of
abortion, to which I responded and he has now replied. The argument is based on the …