Proving properties of security protocols by induction
Proceedings 10th Computer Security Foundations …, 1997 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction
LC Paulson - Computer Security Foundations Workshop, IEEE, 1997 - computer.org
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
[PDF][PDF] Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction1
LC Paulson - researchgate.net
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
Proving properties of security protocols by induction
LC Paulson - 1996 - cl.cam.ac.uk
Security protocols are formally specified in terms of traces, which may involve many
interleaved protocol runs. Traces are defined inductively. Protocol descriptions model …
interleaved protocol runs. Traces are defined inductively. Protocol descriptions model …
[PDF][PDF] Proving Properties of Security Protocols by In
LC Paulson - archiv.infsec.ethz.ch
Informal justijications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction
LC Paulson - Proceedings of the 10th IEEE workshop on Computer …, 1997 - dl.acm.org
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
[引用][C] Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction
LC PAULSON - 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop, 1997 - cir.nii.ac.jp
[PDF][PDF] Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction1
LC Paulson - academia.edu
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
[PDF][PDF] Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction1
LC Paulson - Citeseer
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
[PDF][PDF] Proving Properties of Security Protocols by Induction1
LC Paulson - scholar.archive.org
Informal justifications of security protocols involve arguing backwards that various events are
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …
impossible. Inductive definitions can make such arguments rigorous. The resulting proofs …