Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing

R Hubbard, RM Lindsay - Theory & Psychology, 2008 - journals.sagepub.com
Reporting p values from statistical significance tests is common in psychology's empirical
literature. Sir Ronald Fisher saw the p value as playing a useful role in knowledge …

[引用][C] Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing

R Hubbard, RM Lindsay - Theory and Psychology, 2008 - elibrary.ru
Reporting p values from statistical significance tests is common in psychology" s empirical
literature. Sir Ronald Fisher saw the p value as playing a useful role in knowledge …

Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing

R Hubbard, RM Lindsay - Theory & Psychology, 2008 - cir.nii.ac.jp
抄録< jats: p> Reporting p values from statistical significance tests is common in
psychology's empirical literature. Sir Ronald Fisher saw the p value as playing a useful role …

Why P values are not a useful measure of evidence in statistical significance testing.

R Hubbard, RM Lindsay - Theory & Psychology, 2008 - psycnet.apa.org
Reporting p values from statistical significance tests is common in psychology's empirical
literature. Sir Ronald Fisher saw the p value as playing a useful role in knowledge …

[PDF][PDF] Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing

R Hubbard, RM Lindsay - researchgate.net
Reporting p values from statistical significance tests is common in psychology's empirical
literature. Sir Ronald Fisher saw the p value as playing a useful role in knowledge …

[PDF][PDF] Why P Values Are Not a Useful Measure of Evidence in Statistical Significance Testing

R Hubbard, RM Lindsay - researchgate.net
Reporting p values from statistical significance tests is common in psychology's empirical
literature. Sir Ronald Fisher saw the p value as playing a useful role in knowledge …