A systematic review of outcomes after transanal mesorectal resection for rectal cancer

L Arunachalam, H O'Grady, IA Hunter… - Diseases of the Colon …, 2016 - journals.lww.com
L Arunachalam, H O'Grady, IA Hunter, S Killeen
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2016journals.lww.com
BACKGROUND: Transanal mesorectal resection has been developed to facilitate minimally
invasive proctectomy for rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to
evaluate the evidence regarding technical parameters, oncological outcomes, morbidity,
and mortality after transanal mesorectal resection. DATA SOURCES: The Cochrane Library,
PubMed, and MEDLINE databases were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: Systematic review
of the literature from January 2005 to September 2015 was used for study selection …
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Transanal mesorectal resection has been developed to facilitate minimally invasive proctectomy for rectal cancer.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence regarding technical parameters, oncological outcomes, morbidity, and mortality after transanal mesorectal resection.
DATA SOURCES:
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases were reviewed.
STUDY SELECTION:
Systematic review of the literature from January 2005 to September 2015 was used for study selection.
INTERVENTION:
Intervention included transanal mesorectal resection for rectal cancer.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Technical parameters, histological outcomes, morbidity, and mortality were the outcomes measured.
RESULTS:
Fifteen predominately retrospective studies involving 449 patients were included (mean age, 64.3 years; 64.1% men). Different platforms were used. The operative mortality rate was 0.4% and the cumulative morbidity rate 35.5%. Circumferential resection margins were clear in 98%, and the resected mesorectum was grade III in 87% of patients. Median follow-up was 14.7 months. There were 4 local recurrences (1.5%) and 12 patients (5.6%) with metastatic disease. No study followed patients long enough to report on 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates. Functional outcome was only reported in 3 studies.
LIMITATIONS:
A low number of procedures were performed by expert early adopters. There are no comparative or randomized data included in this study and inconsistent reporting of outcome variables.
CONCLUSIONS:
Transanal mesorectal resection for rectal cancer may enhance negative circumferential margin rates with a reasonable safety profile. Contemporary randomized, controlled studies are required before there can be universal recommendation.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果