Airport complementarity: Private vs. government ownership and welfare gravitation
B Mantin - Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2012 - Elsevier
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2012•Elsevier
We study the effects of airport ownership (private vs. government) on welfare in the presence
of airport complementarity, where each airport is located in a different country. Considering
Cournot competition in the airline market, the unique Nash equilibrium is such that the two
countries privatize their airports, even though both countries are better off, from a welfare
perspective, with public (government-owned) airports. Considering a differentiated Bertrand
competition in the airline market, the same result prevails if the cross price elasticities are …
of airport complementarity, where each airport is located in a different country. Considering
Cournot competition in the airline market, the unique Nash equilibrium is such that the two
countries privatize their airports, even though both countries are better off, from a welfare
perspective, with public (government-owned) airports. Considering a differentiated Bertrand
competition in the airline market, the same result prevails if the cross price elasticities are …
We study the effects of airport ownership (private vs. government) on welfare in the presence of airport complementarity, where each airport is located in a different country. Considering Cournot competition in the airline market, the unique Nash equilibrium is such that the two countries privatize their airports, even though both countries are better off, from a welfare perspective, with public (government-owned) airports. Considering a differentiated Bertrand competition in the airline market, the same result prevails if the cross price elasticities are sufficiently high, otherwise the symmetric government-ownership of airports may also be a Nash equilibrium.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果