An economic theory of infrastructure and commons management

BM Frischmann - Minn. l. reV., 2004 - HeinOnline
Minn. l. reV., 2004HeinOnline
The open access (commons) versus private control debate is raging. The debate takes place
in a number of fields, including the intellectual property and cyberlaw literatures, as well as
in broader public debates concerning propertization, privatization, deregulation, and
commercialization of areas as diverse as communication networks, government services,
national forests, and scientific research. On the private control side, there is robust economic
theory supporting the market mechanism with minimal government regulation. In contrast …
The open access (commons) versus private control debate is raging. The debate takes place in a number of fields, including the intellectual property and cyberlaw literatures, as well as in broader public debates concerning propertization, privatization, deregulation, and commercialization of areas as diverse as communication networks, government services, national forests, and scientific research. On the private control side, there is robust economic theory supporting the market mechanism with minimal government regulation. In contrast, advocates of open access frequently call for protecting" the commons." The theoretical support for this prescriptive call, however, is underdeveloped from an economics perspective. In fact, many who oppose propertization, privatization, deregulation, and commercialization view the field of economics with sincere suspicion and doubt.
HeinOnline
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果