Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging …

KL Gould, NP Johnson, TM Bateman… - Journal of the American …, 2013 - jacc.org
KL Gould, NP Johnson, TM Bateman, RS Beanlands, FM Bengel, R Bober, PG Camici
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013jacc.org
Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to
revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic
severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a
potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management.
This review addresses clinical coronary physiology—pressure and flow—as clinical tools for
treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology …
Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental change from anatomically to physiologically guided management. This review addresses clinical coronary physiology—pressure and flow—as clinical tools for treating patients. We clarify the basic concepts that hold true for whatever technology measures coronary physiology directly and reliably, here focusing on positron emission tomography and its interplay with intracoronary measurements.
jacc.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果