Antipredator mechanisms of Australian frogs

CR Williams, ED Brodie Jr, MJ Tyler, SJ Walker - Journal of Herpetology, 2000 - JSTOR
CR Williams, ED Brodie Jr, MJ Tyler, SJ Walker
Journal of Herpetology, 2000JSTOR
We examined the antipredator mechanisms of 19 Australian hylid species (two genera) and
23 myobatrachid species (nine genera). Frogs of 39 of the 42 species exhibited one or more
defensive mechanisms (other than escape), including postures, bright coloration, adhesive
skin secretions, and/or calls. Defensive posturing occurred in individuals of 38 species, and
varied in relationship to morphology and localization of skin glands. Bright colors, when
present, typically were displayed during defensive postures. We documented dramatic …
We examined the antipredator mechanisms of 19 Australian hylid species (two genera) and 23 myobatrachid species (nine genera). Frogs of 39 of the 42 species exhibited one or more defensive mechanisms (other than escape), including postures, bright coloration, adhesive skin secretions, and/or calls. Defensive posturing occurred in individuals of 38 species, and varied in relationship to morphology and localization of skin glands. Bright colors, when present, typically were displayed during defensive postures. We documented dramatic geographic variation in the antipredator display of one species, Limnodynastes tasmaniensis. Defensive postures were accompanied by secretions from dorsal skin glands. These secretions were sometimes associated with a distinctive odor. Adhesive skin secretions were present in burrowing frogs of three genera. Defensive calls were emitted by most hylids but none of the myobatrachids. We offer a hypothesis of mimicry to explain the behavior pattern of exposing the bold black and white ventral surface in Pseudophryne and Crinia species.
JSTOR
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果