Introduction: Automated skills assessment can provide surgical trainees with objective, personalized feedback during training. Here, we measure the efficacy of artificial intelligence (AI)-based feedback on a robotic suturing task.

Materials and Methods: Forty-two participants with no robotic surgical experience were randomized to a control or feedback group and video-recorded while completing two rounds (R1 and R2) of suturing tasks on a da Vinci surgical robot. Participants were assessed on needle handling and needle driving, and feedback was provided via a visual interface after R1. For feedback group, participants were informed of their AI-based skill assessment and presented with specific video clips from R1. For control group, participants were presented with randomly selected video clips from R1 as a placebo. Participants from each group were further labeled as underperformers or innate-performers based on a median split of their technical skill scores from R1.

Results: Demographic features were similar between the control (n = 20) and feedback group (n = 22) (p > 0.05). Observing the improvement from R1 to R2, the feedback group had a significantly larger improvement in needle handling score (0.30 vs −0.02, p = 0.018) when compared with the control group, although the improvement of needle driving score was not significant when compared with the control group (0.17 vs −0.40, p = 0.074). All innate-performers exhibited similar improvements across rounds, regardless of feedback (p > 0.05). In contrast, underperformers in the feedback group improved more than the control group in needle handling (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: AI-based feedback facilitates surgical trainees' acquisition of robotic technical skills, especially underperformers. Future research will extend AI-based feedback to additional suturing skills, surgical tasks, and experience groups.