Comparison of electrohysterogram characteristics during uterine contraction and non-contraction during labor

Z Liu, D Hao, L Zhang, J Liu, X Zhou… - 2017 39th Annual …, 2017 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
Z Liu, D Hao, L Zhang, J Liu, X Zhou, L Yang, Y Yang, X Li, S Zhang, D Zheng
2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering …, 2017ieeexplore.ieee.org
Uterine contraction is one of the most important indication in the labor progression.
Electrohysterogram (EHG) is a promising method for monitoring uterine contraction and
discriminating efficient and inefficient contractions. This study aims to analyze the difference
of EHG signals between two groups. EHG signals are recorded with abdominal electrodes
from 20 pregnant women, including 10 in term labor group and 10 in non-labor group.
Typical linear and nonlinear characteristics of EHG signals, including root mean square …
Uterine contraction is one of the most important indication in the labor progression. Electrohysterogram (EHG) is a promising method for monitoring uterine contraction and discriminating efficient and inefficient contractions. This study aims to analyze the difference of EHG signals between two groups. EHG signals are recorded with abdominal electrodes from 20 pregnant women, including 10 in term labor group and 10 in non-labor group. Typical linear and nonlinear characteristics of EHG signals, including root mean square (RMS), peak frequency (PF), median frequency (MDF), mean frequency (MNF), parameters from wavelet decomposition (W4, W5) and time reversibility (Tr) are extracted. These characteristics are compared between contraction and non-contraction in term labor group and non-labor group. The result shows that RMS, W4 and W5 of contraction are significantly larger than non-contraction both within term labor group and between two groups (all p<;0.001). However, MDF and MNF are significantly smaller (all p<;0.05). Furthermore, all characteristics of non-contraction show no significant difference between two groups, except MNF. The variability of RMS, W4, W5 and Tr of contraction are significantly larger than non-contraction both within term labor group and between two groups (all p<;0.05, with p<;0.001 for W5 and Tr). However, the variability of MDF, PF and MNF are significantly smaller (all p<;0.05). Moreover, the variability of all characteristics of non-contraction shows no significant difference between two groups, except MNF. We have shown that characteristics of EHG signals and their variability during contraction are quite different from non-contraction. Therefore, it is feasible to separate uterine contractions and monitor uterine activity with EHG signals.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果