Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus standard care in the treatment of neck and upper back myofascial pain: a single blinded randomised …
M Rahbar, M Samandarian… - Clinical …, 2021 - journals.sagepub.com
Clinical Rehabilitation, 2021•journals.sagepub.com
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus standard
care (ultrasound+ hot pack+ self-stretch-exercises) in treatment of neck and upper back
myofascial pain syndrome. Design: Single-blind randomised clinical trial Setting: Outpatients
setting. Subjects: Patients with neck and upper back myofascial pain Intervention:
Participants were randomly allocated into shock wave group (n= 24), standard care
(ultrasound+ hot pack+ self-stretch-exercises) group (n= 24) and control (self-stretch …
care (ultrasound+ hot pack+ self-stretch-exercises) in treatment of neck and upper back
myofascial pain syndrome. Design: Single-blind randomised clinical trial Setting: Outpatients
setting. Subjects: Patients with neck and upper back myofascial pain Intervention:
Participants were randomly allocated into shock wave group (n= 24), standard care
(ultrasound+ hot pack+ self-stretch-exercises) group (n= 24) and control (self-stretch …
Objectives
To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus standard care (ultrasound + hot pack + self-stretch-exercises) in treatment of neck and upper back myofascial pain syndrome.
Design
Single-blind randomised clinical trial
Setting
Outpatients setting.
Subjects
Patients with neck and upper back myofascial pain
Intervention
Participants were randomly allocated into shock wave group (n = 24), standard care (ultrasound + hot pack + self-stretch-exercises) group (n = 24) and control (self-stretch-exercises) group (n = 24) for four weeks.
Main Measures
The primary outcomes were pain intensity (visual analogue scale), pain pressure threshold (algometer) and disability (neck disability index). Measures were performed at baseline (week 0), week 1 and post-intervention (week 4).
Results
Shock wave and ultrasound improved visual analogue scale (7.50 ± 1.71 to 5.72 ± 2.20 and 6.22 ± 2.54 to 4.95 ± 2.86, respectively, P = 0.083) and disability index (54.24 ± 15.53 to 39.04 ± 19.58 50.23 ± 19.57 to 32.10 ± 18.34, respectively, P = 0.495) similarly at first week examinations that were significantly higher than control (P < 0.05). In week 4 measurements, additional improvements were achieved concerning visual analogue scale and disability index in the shock wave (–4.00 ± 2.22 and –20.24 ± 16.56, respectively) and ultrasound (–2.18 ± 2.71 and –21.79 ± 10.56, respectively) groups. However, visual analogue scale improved more significantly in shock wave group than ultrasound group in fourth week measurements (P = 0.012).
Conclusion
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy was more effective in controlling of the pain intensity compared to ultrasound one month after treatment. However it had no superiority over ultrasound in improving neck disability index at this time point.
Trial registration
www.irct.ir, IRCT201608154104N5, registered 2016-09-25
Sage Journals
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果