Accurately quantifying stem taper is essential to predict diameter at any given height along the stem and to estimate tree volume for various sections of the stem. With increased computing power, semi- and nonparamatric methods have been proposed as alternative approaches for modelling tree taper. The main objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of stem taper predicted for four pine and four hardwood species by semi- and nonparametric models. Specifically, generalized additive models (GAM), random forests (RF) and regression-enhanced random forests (RERF) were compared with two widely-used parametric models: variable-exponent function (VAR) and segmented polynomial regression model (SEG). Test datasets selected from four different data splitting methods were used to examine the prediction accuracy of the models. Results showed that all examined models can be used to quantify stem taper and volume for all species when prediction is limited to be within the range of tree sizes used in model building. The nonparametric RF algorithm generally produced higher bias and lower precision than the semiparametric (GAM and RERF) and parametric models (VAR and SEG). For all species, GAM, VAR and SEG provided more robust predictions of stem taper than RF and RERF algorithms, especially when small or large trees were withheld for model testing. The data splitting strategies used in this work provide an efficient ‘stress test’ to evaluate model performance when collecting an independent test dataset is not feasible. The findings of this work provide additional insights for forest practitioners and resource managers to select appropriate methods in stem taper modelling.