Fingerstick glucose monitoring in veterans affairs nursing home residents with diabetes mellitus
SY Jeon, Y Shi, AK Lee, L Hunt… - Journal of the …, 2021 - Wiley Online Library
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021•Wiley Online Library
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Guidelines recommend less intensive glycemic treatment and
less frequent glucose monitoring for nursing home (NH) residents. However, little is known
about the frequency of fingerstick (FS) glucose monitoring in this population. Our objective
was to examine the frequency of FS glucose monitoring in Veterans Affairs (VA) NH
residents with diabetes mellitus, type II (T2DM). DESIGN AND SETTING National
retrospective cohort study in 140 VA NHs. PARTICIPANTS NH residents with T2DM and …
less frequent glucose monitoring for nursing home (NH) residents. However, little is known
about the frequency of fingerstick (FS) glucose monitoring in this population. Our objective
was to examine the frequency of FS glucose monitoring in Veterans Affairs (VA) NH
residents with diabetes mellitus, type II (T2DM). DESIGN AND SETTING National
retrospective cohort study in 140 VA NHs. PARTICIPANTS NH residents with T2DM and …
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
Guidelines recommend less intensive glycemic treatment and less frequent glucose monitoring for nursing home (NH) residents. However, little is known about the frequency of fingerstick (FS) glucose monitoring in this population. Our objective was to examine the frequency of FS glucose monitoring in Veterans Affairs (VA) NH residents with diabetes mellitus, type II (T2DM).
DESIGN AND SETTING
National retrospective cohort study in 140 VA NHs.
PARTICIPANTS
NH residents with T2DM and older than 65 years admitted to VA NHs between 2013 and 2015 following discharge from a VA hospital.
MEASUREMENTS
NH residents were classified into five groups based on their highest hypoglycemia risk glucose‐lowering medication (GLM) each day: no GLMs; metformin only; sulfonylureas; long‐acting insulin; and any short‐acting insulin. Our outcome was a daily count of FS measurements.
RESULTS
Among 17,474 VA NH residents, mean age was 76 (standard deviation (SD) = 8) years and mean hemoglobin A1c was 7.6% (SD = 1.5%). On day 1 after NH admission, 49% of NH residents were on short‐acting insulin, decreasing slightly to 43% at day 90. Overall, NH residents had an average of 1.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.8–1.9) FS measurements on NH day 1, decreasing to 1.4 (95% CI = 1.3–1.4) by day 90. NH residents on short‐acting insulin had the most frequent FS measurements, with 3.0 measurements (95% CI = 2.9–3.0) on day 1, decreasing to 2.6 measurements (95% CI = 2.5–2.7) by day 90. Less frequent FS measurements were seen for NH residents receiving long‐acting insulin (2.1 (95% CI = 2.0–2.2) on day 1) and sulfonylureas (1.7 (95% CI = 1.5–1.8) on day 1). Even NH residents on metformin monotherapy had 1.1 (95% CI = 1.1–1.2) measurements on day 1, decreasing to 0.5 (95% CI = 0.4–0.6) measurements on day 90.
CONCLUSION
Although guidelines recommend less frequent glucose monitoring for NH residents, we found that many VA NH residents receive frequent FS monitoring. Given the uncertain benefits and potential for substantial patient burdens and harms, our results suggest decreasing FS monitoring may be warranted for many low hypoglycemia risk NH residents.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果