Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids UK, a weight management programme for fathers: feasibility RCT

T Griffin, Y Sun, M Sidhu, P Adab, A Burgess… - BMJ open, 2019 - bmjopen.bmj.com
T Griffin, Y Sun, M Sidhu, P Adab, A Burgess, C Collins, A Daley, A Entwistle, E Frew
BMJ open, 2019bmjopen.bmj.com
Objective To assess (1) the feasibility of delivering a culturally adapted weight management
programme, Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids United Kingdom (HDHK-UK), for fathers with
overweight or obesity and their primary school-aged children, and (2) the feasibility of
conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT). Design A two-arm, randomised
feasibility trial with a mixed-methods process evaluation. Setting Socioeconomically
disadvantaged, ethnically diverse localities in West Midlands, UK. Participants Fathers with …
Objective
To assess (1) the feasibility of delivering a culturally adapted weight management programme, Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids United Kingdom (HDHK-UK), for fathers with overweight or obesity and their primary school-aged children, and (2) the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).
Design
A two-arm, randomised feasibility trial with a mixed-methods process evaluation.
Setting
Socioeconomically disadvantaged, ethnically diverse localities in West Midlands, UK.
Participants
Fathers with overweight or obesity and their children aged 4–11 years.
Intervention
Participants were randomised in a 1:2 ratio to control (family voucher for a leisure centre) or intervention comprising 9 weekly healthy lifestyle group sessions.
Outcomes
Feasibility of the intervention and RCT was assessed according to prespecified progression criteria: study recruitment, consent and follow-up, ability to deliver intervention, intervention fidelity, adherence and acceptability, weight loss, using questionnaires and measurements at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and through qualitative interviews.
Results
The study recruited 43 men, 48% of the target sample size; the mean body mass index was 30.2 kg/m2 (SD 5.1); 61% were from a minority ethnic group; and 54% were from communities in the most disadvantaged quintile for socioeconomic deprivation. Recruitment was challenging. Retention at follow-up of 3 and 6 months was 63%. Identifying delivery sites and appropriately skilled and trained programme facilitators proved difficult. Four programmes were delivered in leisure centres and community venues. Of the 29 intervention participants, 20 (69%) attended the intervention at least once, of whom 75% attended ≥5 sessions. Sessions were delivered with high fidelity. Participants rated sessions as ‘good/very good’ and reported lifestyle behavioural change. Weight loss at 6 months in the intervention group (n=17) was 2.9 kg (95% CI −5.1 to −0.6).
Conclusions
The intervention was well received, but there were significant challenges in recruitment, programme delivery and follow-up. The HDHK-UK study was not considered feasible for progression to a full RCT based on prespecified stop–go criteria.
Trial registration number
ISRCTN16724454.
bmjopen.bmj.com
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果