Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19: a living systematic review
AV Hernandez, YM Roman, V Pasupuleti… - Annals of internal …, 2020 - acpjournals.org
Annals of internal medicine, 2020•acpjournals.org
An update is available for this article. Background: Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine
have antiviral effects in vitro against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2). Purpose: To summarize evidence about the benefits and harms of
hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the treatment or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19). Data Sources: PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web
of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, Preprints, ClinicalTrials. gov, World Health …
have antiviral effects in vitro against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
(SARS-CoV-2). Purpose: To summarize evidence about the benefits and harms of
hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the treatment or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19). Data Sources: PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web
of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, Preprints, ClinicalTrials. gov, World Health …
An update is available for this article.
Background
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine have antiviral effects in vitro against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Purpose
To summarize evidence about the benefits and harms of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine for the treatment or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Data Sources
PubMed (via MEDLINE), EMBASE (via Ovid), Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, bioRxiv, Preprints, ClinicalTrials.gov, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from 1 December 2019 until 8 May 2020.
Study Selection
Studies in any language reporting efficacy or safety outcomes from hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine use in any setting in adults or children with suspected COVID-19 or at risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Data Extraction
Independent, dually performed data extraction and quality assessments.
Data Synthesis
Four randomized controlled trials, 10 cohort studies, and 9 case series assessed treatment effects of the medications, but no studies evaluated prophylaxis. Evidence was conflicting and insufficient regarding the effect of hydroxychloroquine on such outcomes as all-cause mortality, progression to severe disease, clinical symptoms, and upper respiratory virologic clearance with antigen testing. Several studies found that patients receiving hydroxychloroquine developed a QTc interval of 500 ms or greater, but the proportion of patients with this finding varied among the studies. Two studies assessed the efficacy of chloroquine; 1 trial, which compared higher-dose (600 mg twice daily for 10 days) with lower-dose (450 mg twice daily on day 1 and once daily for 4 days) therapy, was stopped owing to concern that the higher dose therapy increased lethality and QTc interval prolongation. An observational study that compared adults with COVID-19 receiving chloroquine phosphate, 500 mg once or twice daily, with patients not receiving chloroquine found minor fever resolution and virologic clearance benefits with chloroquine.
Limitation
There were few controlled studies, and control for confounding was inadequate in observational studies.
Conclusion
Evidence on the benefits and harms of using hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine to treat COVID-19 is very weak and conflicting.
Primary Funding Source
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
acpjournals.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果