Improving evaluation to address the unintended consequences of health information technology
F Magrabi, E Ammenwerth, H Hyppönen… - Yearbook of medical …, 2016 - thieme-connect.com
Yearbook of medical informatics, 2016•thieme-connect.com
Background and objectives: With growing use of IT by healthcare professionals and patients,
the opportunity for any unintended effects of technology to disrupt care health processes and
outcomes is intensified. The objectives of this position paper by the IMIA Working Group
(WG) on Technology Assessment and Quality Development are to highlight how our
ongoing initiatives to enhance evaluation are also addressing the unintended
consequences of health IT. Methods: Review of WG initiatives Results: We argue that an …
the opportunity for any unintended effects of technology to disrupt care health processes and
outcomes is intensified. The objectives of this position paper by the IMIA Working Group
(WG) on Technology Assessment and Quality Development are to highlight how our
ongoing initiatives to enhance evaluation are also addressing the unintended
consequences of health IT. Methods: Review of WG initiatives Results: We argue that an …
Background and objectives: With growing use of IT by healthcare professionals and patients, the opportunity for any unintended effects of technology to disrupt care health processes and outcomes is intensified. The objectives of this position paper by the IMIA Working Group (WG) on Technology Assessment and Quality Development are to highlight how our ongoing initiatives to enhance evaluation are also addressing the unintended consequences of health IT.
Methods: Review of WG initiatives Results: We argue that an evidence-based approach underpinned by rigorous evaluation is fundamental to the safe and effective use of IT, and for detecting and addressing its unintended consequences in a timely manner. We provide an overview of our ongoing initiatives to strengthen study design, execution and reporting by using evaluation frameworks and guidelines which can enable better characterization and monitoring of unintended consequences, including the Good Evaluation Practice Guideline in Health Informatics (GEP-HI) and the Statement on Reporting of Evaluation Studies in Health Informatics (STARE-HI). Indicators to benchmark the adoption and impact of IT can similarly be used to monitor unintended effects on healthcare structures, processes and outcome. We have also developed EvalDB, a web-based database of evaluation studies to promulgate evidence about unintended effects and are developing the content for courses to improve training in health IT evaluation.
Conclusion: Evaluation is an essential ingredient for the effective use of IT to improve healthcare quality and patient safety. WG resources and skills development initiatives can facilitate a pro-active and evidence-based approach to detecting and addressing the unintended effects of health IT.
Thieme Connect
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果