While anterior temporal lobe (ATL) resection is an effective treatment for temporal lobe epilepsy, surgery on the dominant hemisphere is associated with variable decline in confrontation naming. Accurate prediction of naming impairment is critical to inform clinical decision making, and while there has been some degree of success using task‐based functional MRI (fMRI) paradigms, there remains a growing interest in the predictive utility of resting‐state connectivity as it allows for relatively shorter scans with low task demands. Our objective was to assess the relationship between measures of preoperative resting‐state connectivity and postoperative naming change in patients following left ATL resection. We compared the resting language network connectivity of each patient to a normative healthy control template using a novel measure called “matrix similarity,” and found that patients with more abnormal global language‐network connectivity—particularly of regions spared from surgery—showed greater postoperative naming decline than those with normative patterns of connectivity. When we interrogated the degree centrality of to‐be‐resected regions in a more targeted approach of the pathological temporal lobe, we found that greater functional integration of those regions with the rest of the language network at rest was related to greater decline in naming following surgery. Finally, we found that matrix similarity was a better predictor of postoperative outcome than degree within to‐be‐resected regions, network clustering, modularity, and language task fMRI laterality. We provide some of the first evidence that using this novel measure, a relatively short preoperative resting scan can be exploited to inform naming ability following ATL resection.