Low‐rank magnetic resonance fingerprinting

G Mazor, L Weizman, A Tal, YC Eldar - Medical physics, 2018 - Wiley Online Library
Medical physics, 2018Wiley Online Library
Purpose Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a relatively new approach that provides
quantitative MRI measures using randomized acquisition. Extraction of physical quantitative
tissue parameters is performed offline, without the need of patient presence, based on
acquisition with varying parameters and a dictionary generated according to the Bloch
equation simulations. MRF uses hundreds of radio frequency (RF) excitation pulses for
acquisition, and therefore, a high undersampling ratio in the sampling domain (k‐space) is …
Purpose
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is a relatively new approach that provides quantitative MRI measures using randomized acquisition. Extraction of physical quantitative tissue parameters is performed offline, without the need of patient presence, based on acquisition with varying parameters and a dictionary generated according to the Bloch equation simulations. MRF uses hundreds of radio frequency (RF) excitation pulses for acquisition, and therefore, a high undersampling ratio in the sampling domain (k‐space) is required for reasonable scanning time. This undersampling causes spatial artifacts that hamper the ability to accurately estimate the tissue's quantitative values. In this work, we introduce a new approach for quantitative MRI using MRF, called magnetic resonance fingerprinting with low rank (FLOR).
Methods
We exploit the low‐rank property of the concatenated temporal imaging contrasts, on top of the fact that the MRF signal is sparsely represented in the generated dictionary domain. We present an iterative recovery scheme that consists of a gradient step followed by a low‐rank projection using the singular value decomposition.
Results
Experimental results consist of retrospective sampling that allows comparison to a well defined reference, and prospective sampling that shows the performance of FLOR for a real‐data sampling scenario. Both experiments demonstrate improved parameter accuracy compared to other compressed‐sensing and low‐rank based methods for MRF at 5% and 9% sampling ratios for the retrospective and prospective experiments, respectively.
Conclusions
We have shown through retrospective and prospective experiments that by exploiting the low‐rank nature of the MRF signal, FLOR recovers the MRF temporal undersampled images and provides more accurate parameter maps compared to previous iterative approaches.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果