[PDF][PDF] Machine learning for resting state fMRI-based preoperative mapping: comparison with task-based fMRI and direct cortical stimulation

IN Pronin, MG Sharaev… - Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im …, 2022 - researchgate.net
IN Pronin, MG Sharaev, TV Melnikova-Pitskhelauri, AS Smirnov, AV Bernshtein, VE Yarkin
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im NN Burdenko, 2022researchgate.net
Objective. To develop a system for preoperative prediction of individual activations of motor
and speech areas in patients with brain gliomas using resting state fMRI (rsfMRI), task-
based fMRI (tb-fMRI), direct cortical stimulation and machine learning methods. Material and
methods. Thirty-three patients with gliomas (19 females and 14 males aged 19-540)
underwent DCS-assisted resection of tumor (19 ones with lesion of motor zones and 14
patients with lesions of speech areas). Awake craniotomy was performed in 14 cases …
Objective
To develop a system for preoperative prediction of individual activations of motor and speech areas in patients with brain gliomas using resting state fMRI (rsfMRI), task-based fMRI (tb-fMRI), direct cortical stimulation and machine learning methods.
Material and methods
Thirty-three patients with gliomas (19 females and 14 males aged 19-540) underwent DCS-assisted resection of tumor (19 ones with lesion of motor zones and 14 patients with lesions of speech areas). Awake craniotomy was performed in 14 cases. Preoperative mapping was performed according to special MRI protocol (T1, tb-fMRI, rs-fMRI). Machine learning system was built on open source data from The Human Connectome Project. MR data of 200 healthy subjects from this database were used for system pre-training. Further, this system was trained on the data of our patients with gliomas.
Results
In DCS, we obtained 332 stimulations including 173 with positive response. According to comparison of functional activations between rs-fMRI and tb-fMRI, there were more positive DCS responses predicted by rs-fMRI (132 vs 112). Non-response stimulation sites (negative) prevailed in tb-fMRI activations (69 vs 44).
Conclusion
The developed method with machine learning based on resting state fMRI showed greater sensitivity compared to classical task-based fMRI after verification with DCS: 0.72 versus 0.66 (p< 0.05) for identifying the speech zones and 0.79 versus 0.62 (p< 0.05) for motor areas.
researchgate.net
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果