Managing work-life policies: Disruption versus dependency arguments. Explaining managerial attitudes towards employee utilization of work-life policies

L Den Dulk, J De Ruijter - The International Journal of Human …, 2008 - Taylor & Francis
L Den Dulk, J De Ruijter
The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2008Taylor & Francis
What factors shape managerial attitudes towards the utilization of work-life policies? The
influence of disruptiveness (Powell and Mainiero 1999) and dependency (Klein, Berman
and Dickson 2000) arguments on managerial attitudes is examined using a vignette design.
In this study, managers in four financial firms in the UK and the Netherlands were asked to
judge hypothetical requests from employees to utilize work-life policies. Findings indicate
that managers are mainly interested in the performance of their department or work unit, and …
What factors shape managerial attitudes towards the utilization of work-life policies? The influence of disruptiveness (Powell and Mainiero 1999) and dependency (Klein, Berman and Dickson 2000) arguments on managerial attitudes is examined using a vignette design. In this study, managers in four financial firms in the UK and the Netherlands were asked to judge hypothetical requests from employees to utilize work-life policies. Findings indicate that managers are mainly interested in the performance of their department or work unit, and work-life policies are often seen as disruptive. However, when the least disruptive request is considered (short-term leave), we find that dependency arguments also play an important role and managers are more likely to respond to their employees' personal and family needs.
Taylor & Francis Online
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果