On the matter of suffering: Derek Parfit and the possibility of deserved punishment
L Zaibert - Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2017 - Springer
Criminal Law and Philosophy, 2017•Springer
Derek Parfit has recently defended the view that no one can ever deserve to suffer. Were this
view correct, its implications for the thorny problem of the justification of punishment would
be extraordinary: age-old debates between consequentialists and retributivists would simply
vanish, as punishment would only—and simply—be justifiable along Benthamite utilitarian
lines. I here suggest that Parfit's view is linked to uncharacteristically weak arguments, and
that it ought to be rejected.
view correct, its implications for the thorny problem of the justification of punishment would
be extraordinary: age-old debates between consequentialists and retributivists would simply
vanish, as punishment would only—and simply—be justifiable along Benthamite utilitarian
lines. I here suggest that Parfit's view is linked to uncharacteristically weak arguments, and
that it ought to be rejected.
Abstract
Derek Parfit has recently defended the view that no one can ever deserve to suffer. Were this view correct, its implications for the thorny problem of the justification of punishment would be extraordinary: age-old debates between consequentialists and retributivists would simply vanish, as punishment would only—and simply—be justifiable along Benthamite utilitarian lines. I here suggest that Parfit’s view is linked to uncharacteristically weak arguments, and that it ought to be rejected.
Springer
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果