On two generalizations of the Alon–Tarsi polynomial method
D Hefetz - Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2011 - Elsevier
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2011•Elsevier
In a seminal paper (Alon and Tarsi, 1992 [6]), Alon and Tarsi have introduced an algebraic
technique for proving upper bounds on the choice number of graphs (and thus, in particular,
upper bounds on their chromatic number). The upper bound on the choice number of G
obtained via their method, was later coined the Alon–Tarsi number of G and was denoted by
AT (G)(see eg Jensen and Toft (1995)[20]). They have provided a combinatorial
interpretation of this parameter in terms of the eulerian subdigraphs of an appropriate …
technique for proving upper bounds on the choice number of graphs (and thus, in particular,
upper bounds on their chromatic number). The upper bound on the choice number of G
obtained via their method, was later coined the Alon–Tarsi number of G and was denoted by
AT (G)(see eg Jensen and Toft (1995)[20]). They have provided a combinatorial
interpretation of this parameter in terms of the eulerian subdigraphs of an appropriate …
In a seminal paper (Alon and Tarsi, 1992 [6]), Alon and Tarsi have introduced an algebraic technique for proving upper bounds on the choice number of graphs (and thus, in particular, upper bounds on their chromatic number). The upper bound on the choice number of G obtained via their method, was later coined the Alon–Tarsi number of G and was denoted by AT(G) (see e.g. Jensen and Toft (1995) [20]). They have provided a combinatorial interpretation of this parameter in terms of the eulerian subdigraphs of an appropriate orientation of G. Their characterization can be restated as follows. Let D be an orientation of G. Assign a weight ωD(H) to every subdigraph H of D: if H⊆D is eulerian, then ωD(H)=(−1)e(H), otherwise ωD(H)=0. Alon and Tarsi proved that AT(G)⩽k if and only if there exists an orientation D of G in which the out-degree of every vertex is strictly less than k, and moreover ∑H⊆DωD(H)≠0. Shortly afterwards (Alon, 1993 [3]), for the special case of line graphs of d-regular d-edge-colorable graphs, Alon gave another interpretation of AT(G), this time in terms of the signed d-colorings of the line graph. In this paper we generalize both results. The first characterization is generalized by showing that there is an infinite family of weight functions (which includes the one considered by Alon and Tarsi), each of which can be used to characterize AT(G). The second characterization is generalized to all graphs (in fact the result is even more general—in particular it applies to hypergraphs). We then use the second generalization to prove that χ(G)=ch(G)=AT(G) holds for certain families of graphs G. Some of these results generalize certain known choosability results.
Elsevier
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果