Aims:  To compare efficacy and safety of two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) titration targets [4.4–6.1 mmol/l (80–110 mg/dl) and 3.9–5.0 mmol/l (70–90 mg/dl)] using a patient‐directed, treat‐to‐target algorithm for once‐daily basal insulin in insulin‐naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes suboptimally treated with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs).

Methods:  In this 20‐week, randomized, controlled, open‐label, multicentre, treat‐to‐target study, 244 insulin‐naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes, HbA_1c≥7.0 and ≤9.0% on OAD treatment, were randomized (1 : 1) to one of two treatment arms using 3.9–5.0 or 4.4–6.1 mmol/l FPG as titration targets. Once‐daily insulin detemir doses were adjusted using algorithm‐guided patient‐directed titration to achieve target FPG values.

Results:  Overall, the combined treatment groups achieved a mean HbA_1c level of 6.9% at the end of the study. Substantial reductions in HbA_1c were seen in both treatment groups, with the majority of subjects in both titration groups at the end of the study achieving the American Diabetes Association (ADA)‐recommended HbA_1c level of <7%. In the 3.9–5.0 mmol/l FPG target treatment group, HbA_1c values decreased from a baseline mean of 8.0% to 6.8% at 20 weeks. In the 4.4–6.1 mmol/l FPG target group, HbA_1c values decreased from 7.9% at baseline to 7.0% at 20 weeks (Intention to treat ‐ last observation carried forward data set). These decreases were significantly different between the two treatment groups (Least squares mean difference = −0.271, 95% CI −0.441 to −0.101, p = 0.0019), favouring the FPG target of 3.9–5.0 mmol/l vs. the 4.4–6.1 mmol/l target. At the end of the study period, 64.3% of subjects in the 3.9–5.0 mmol/l treatment group achieved HbA_1c levels <7% compared with 54.5% of subjects in the 4.4–6.1 mmol/l group (95% CI 1.03–3.37, odds ratio 1.86, p = 0.04). Insulin detemir dosing patterns were similar between treatment groups, with the 3.9–5.0 mmol/l group using slightly greater doses throughout the study period (0.57 U/kg vs. 0.51 U/kg at the end of the study). Overall rates of hypoglycaemia episodes were low and were comparable between treatment groups (7.73 and 5.27 events/subject/year for the 3.9–5.0 and 4.4–6.1 mmol/l groups, respectively). A single event of major hypoglycaemia was reported in the 3.9–5.0 mmol/l group. Mean weight changes from baseline to the end of the study were small and did not differ significantly between treatment groups.

Conclusions:  The 3.9–5.0 mmol/l FPG target showed superior efficacy compared with the 4.4–6.1 mmol/l target, although both FPG titration targets resulted in substantial reductions of HbA_1c in patients with type 2 diabetes using a patient‐directed insulin titration algorithm. A majority of subjects in both titration groups achieved the ADA‐recommended guideline of <7% HbA_1c at the end of the study with low rates of hypoglycaemia. These data indicate that lowering the fasting glucose target using a self‐directed titration algorithm with once‐daily detemir is safe and increases the likelihood of achieving the target level of HbA_1c. Indeed, using this approach, a majority of patients can achieve an HbA_1c of <7%.