Phenotyping and predicting wheat spike characteristics using image analysis and machine learning

M Hammers, ZJ Winn, A Ben‐Hur… - The Plant Phenome …, 2023 - Wiley Online Library
M Hammers, ZJ Winn, A Ben‐Hur, D Larkin, J Murry, RE Mason
The Plant Phenome Journal, 2023Wiley Online Library
Improvements in trait phenotyping are needed to increase the quantity and quality of data
available for genetic improvement of crops. In this study, we used moderate throughput
image analysis and machine learning as a pipeline for phenotyping a key wheat spike
characteristic: spikelet number per spike. A population of 594 soft red winter wheat inbred
lines was evaluated in the field for 2 years and images of wheat spikes were taken and used
to train deep‐learning algorithms to predict spikelet number. A total of 12,717 images were …
Abstract
Improvements in trait phenotyping are needed to increase the quantity and quality of data available for genetic improvement of crops. In this study, we used moderate throughput image analysis and machine learning as a pipeline for phenotyping a key wheat spike characteristic: spikelet number per spike. A population of 594 soft red winter wheat inbred lines was evaluated in the field for 2 years and images of wheat spikes were taken and used to train deep‐learning algorithms to predict spikelet number. A total of 12,717 images were used to train, test, and validate a basic regression convolutional neural network (CNN), a visual geometry group application regression model, VGG16, the ResNet152V2 model, and the EfficientNetV2L model. The EfficientNetV2L model was the most accurate, having the lowest mean absolute error, second lowest root mean square error, and highest coefficient of determination (mean absolute error [MAE] = 0.60, root mean square error [RMSE] = 0.79, and R2 = 0.90). The ResNet152V2 model was slightly less accurate with a slightly better fit (MAE = 0.61,m RMSE = 0.78, and R2 = 0.87), followed by the basic CNN (MAE = 0.75, RMSE = 1.00, and R2 = 0.74) and finally by the VGG16 (MAE = 1.51, RMSE = 1.29, and R2 = 0.076). With an average error of just above one half of a spikelet, utilizing image analysis and machine learning counting methods could be used for multiple breeding applications, including direct selection of spikelet number, to provide data to identify quantitative trait loci, or for training whole genome selection models.
Wiley Online Library
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果