Prognostic value of minimal left atrial volume in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

SH Shin, B Claggett, RM Inciardi… - Journal of the …, 2021 - Am Heart Assoc
SH Shin, B Claggett, RM Inciardi, ABS Santos, SJ Shah, MR Zile, MA Pfeffer, AM Shah…
Journal of the American Heart Association, 2021Am Heart Assoc
Background Maximal left atrial (LA) volume is reported by most echocardiography
laboratories and is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF).
Recent studies suggest that minimal LA volume may better reflect left ventricular filling
pressure and may be more prognostic than maximal LA volume. This study assessed the
prognostic value of indexed minimal LA volume (LAVImin) in patients with HF with preserved
ejection fraction. Methods and Results We assessed the relationship of LAVImin with a …
Background
Maximal left atrial (LA) volume is reported by most echocardiography laboratories and is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Recent studies suggest that minimal LA volume may better reflect left ventricular filling pressure and may be more prognostic than maximal LA volume. This study assessed the prognostic value of indexed minimal LA volume (LAVImin) in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.
Methods and Results
We assessed the relationship of LAVImin with a primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, aborted cardiac death, or HF hospitalization in 347 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction enrolled from the Americas region in TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial). We compared LAVImin with indexed maximal LA volume with respect to their prognostic values. In addition, we assessed if LA functional parameters provide additional prognostic information over LAVImin. During a median follow‐up of 2.5 years, 107 patients (31%) experienced a primary composite end point. LAVImin was associated with increased risk of a primary composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.12–1.61) and HF hospitalization alone (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17–1.71) after adjusting for clinical confounders and ejection fraction. In contrast, indexed maximal LA volume was not related to the primary composite outcome, but related to HF alone (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02–1.54). In comparison with indexed maximal LA volume, LAVImin was significantly more prognostic for primary composite outcome (P for comparison=0.032). Both LA emptying fraction and LA strain were prognostic of primary outcome independent of LAVImin (all P<0.05).
Conclusions
In patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, LAVImin was more predictive of cardiovascular outcome than indexed maximal LA volume, suggesting this measure may be more physiologically relevant and might better identify patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. LA functional parameters provide prognostic information independent of LAVImin.
Registration
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00094302.
Am Heart Assoc
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果