Quantification of wave reflection using peripheral blood pressure waveforms

CS Kim, N Fazeli, MS McMurtry… - IEEE Journal of …, 2014 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2014ieeexplore.ieee.org
This paper presents a novel minimally invasive method for quantifying blood pressure (BP)
wave reflection in the arterial tree. In this method, two peripheral BP waveforms are
analyzed to obtain an estimate of central aortic BP waveform, which is used together with a
peripheral BP waveform to compute forward and backward pressure waves. These forward
and backward waves are then used to quantify the strength of wave reflection in the arterial
tree. Two unique strengths of the proposed method are that 1) it replaces highly invasive …
This paper presents a novel minimally invasive method for quantifying blood pressure (BP) wave reflection in the arterial tree. In this method, two peripheral BP waveforms are analyzed to obtain an estimate of central aortic BP waveform, which is used together with a peripheral BP waveform to compute forward and backward pressure waves. These forward and backward waves are then used to quantify the strength of wave reflection in the arterial tree. Two unique strengths of the proposed method are that 1) it replaces highly invasive central aortic BP and flow waveforms required in many existing methods by less invasive peripheral BP waveforms, and 2) it does not require estimation of characteristic impedance. The feasibility of the proposed method was examined in an experimental swine subject under a wide range of physiologic states and in 13 cardiac surgery patients. In the swine subject, the method was comparable to the reference method based on central aortic BP and flow. In cardiac surgery patients, the method was able to estimate forward and backward pressure waves in the absence of any central aortic waveforms: on the average, the root-mean-squared error between actual versus computed forward and backward pressure waves was less than 5 mmHg, and the error between actual versus computed reflection index was less than 0.03.
ieeexplore.ieee.org
以上显示的是最相近的搜索结果。 查看全部搜索结果